TQF 7 Program Report

Program Report herein refers to annual report submitted by program coordinator or program directors to reflect program management effectiveness such as statistical data of students in the program, internal and external environment of the institution that may impact on the program. The report includes the summary of all course reports in the program, teaching efficiency that lead to learning outcomes, benchmarking to other standards, evaluation report of graduates and graduate employers, suggestions for planning and development, and action plan to develop faculty members and staffs. The report will be submitted to the dean. This report will be used for improving and advancing the program, and to gain approval for external examiner.

Program report consisted of 9 sections

Section 1	General Information

Section 2	Statistical Information

Section 3	Changes that impact program

Section 4	Program Courses

Section 5	Program Management

Section 6	Program Evaluation Report

Section 7	Teaching Quality

Section 8	Comments and Suggestions of External Examiner

Section 9	Program Improvement Plan

Program Report of Program

(International Program)

Academic Year

Institution Name	Kasem Bundit University

Faculty/Institution

Section 1 General Information

1. Program

2. Degree Level

3. Faculty members responsible for the program

Name	Degree Level	Identification Number
1.	X-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-X
2.	X-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-X
3.	X-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-X
4.	X-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-X
5.	X-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-X

4. Report Date

5. Academic Year

6. Venue

Campus, Kasem Bundit University

Identify campus where courses are taken place

Section 2 Statistical Information

1. Number of freshmen enrolled in this academic year	students

2. Number of graduate in this academic year	students

2.1. Number of graduates completed the program prior to prescribed period students

2.2. Number of graduates completed the program within prescribed period	students

2.3. Number of graduates completed the program after prescribed period	students

2.4. Number of graduates in each major

Identify major and number of graduates in each major

Major in	with	graduates

Major in	with	graduates

Major in	with	graduates

3. Graduation Rate Information

3.1 Percentage of graduate completed the program within prescribed period

Apply number of graduates completed the program within prescribed period (in item 2.2) and total number of admitted student in the same class (academic year)

Also justify factors that may influence on graduation rate (e.g. changing student status from non-degree student to degree student, or changing major)

4. Number and Percentage of students completed courses as study plan each year

Class/Year of Admission	Academic Year (จำนวนคนรับจริง)
2010	2011	2012	2013	2104	2015
X
X	X
X	X	X
X	X	X	X
X	X	X	X	-
X	X	X	X	-	-
X	X
X	X	X	X	X	X
X	X
Percentage of students completed courses as study plan (apply number of sophomore of each class)	X	X

5. The changing rate of number of student in each academic year

Percentage of total number of student of class in previous year to number of students completed courses as study plan and continue their study in the program

First-year students who continued their studies in the second year	%

Second-year students who continued their studies in the third year	%	Third-year students who continued their studies in the forth year	%

6. Factors that impact on the number of student according to study plan

7. Employment rate of graduates within 1 year after program completion

Response Date Number of Distributed Questionnaires , Number of Response Response Rate Employment Information Employment Employed No intention to work Unemployed Relevant to field of study Not Relevant to field of study Pursue Education Other reasons Number Percentage

8. Employment Analysis

Analyze the change or tendency of employment base on labor force circumstance and economic while compare the information to other universities that offer the same program. Apply the analysis to improve the program.

Section 3 Changes that impact the program

1. University internal changes (if any) that impact on the program within the past two years.

2. University external changes (if any) that impact on the program within the past two years.

Section 4 Program Courses

1. Summary of offered courses in semester/academic year

Identify all offered courses, number of registered students, number of student who passed and grade distribution

Courses	Semester/Academic Year	Grade Distribution	No. of registered student	No. of student who passed
A	B+	B	C+	C	D+	D	F	Ia	W	I	S	U	Au

2. Analysis of abnormal grade distribution

Identify course code and course title with abnormal grade distribution such as course with extreamly high and low grade, or difference from grading standard, or large number of student fail the course, or teaching content is not compatible to course description. Also, identify the process to investigate the abnormality, factors caused the abnomality, imposed remedy plan (Attach summary of assessment and imposed remedy plan if needed)

2.1 Course Code and Course Title	Abnormality

Investigation Process

Factors caused the abnormality

Imposed remedy plan (if needed)

3. Offered Courses Information

3.1 Courses which were not offered as study plan and reasons

Identify course code and course title which were not offered as study plan, justify it, such as no instructor for particular core course, or limitted number of registered student to the course, then, provide remedy plan (if any). The revise offered course plan must essure that the course will be offered in the subsequence semester and student will be able to register for the course.

Course Code and Course Title	Reasons	Remedy Plan (if any)

3.2 Remedy plan for course taught with incomplete content coverage

Identify course code and courses title, the content or topic that were not taught, the reason, remedy plan (if any)

Course Code and Course Title	content/topic	Reasons

Imposed Remedy Plan

Section 5 Program Management

5.1 Program Management Problem

Identify program management problem, impact of problem on program effectiveness, prevention measure and remedy plan

Program Management Problems	Impact of Proble on Program Effectiveness	Prevention Measure and Remedy Plan

Section 6 Program Evaluation Report

1. Evaluation by graduating student (reported as year of conduted survey)

Response Date ............................. (Attach responded questionnaires)

1.1 Important Comments	Faculty member’s response to the comment

1.2. Suggestion to improve the program from comments in (1.1)

2. Evaluation by stakeholder

Provide evaluation process that ask graduates employer or involved person to evaluate

2.1. Important Comments	Faculty member’s response to the comment

2.2. Suggestion to improve the program from comments in (2.1) (if any)

3. Quality Evaluation according to Qualification Framework

Performance Indicators	Performance	Description or Reference
(1) At least 80 % of faculty members are involved in planning, monitoring, and review program performance
(2) Program Specification (TQF 2) comply with national qualification framework or professional qualification standard (if any)
(3) Course Specification and Field Experience Specification (if any) comply with TQF3 and TQF4 and submitted before semester begins.
(4) Course Report and Field Experience Report (if any) are comply with TQF 6 and TQF 6 and submitted within 30 days after semester end.
(5) Program Report are complied with TQF 7 and submitted within 60 days after semester end.
(6) Learning outcome verification as specified in TQF 3 and TQF 4 (if any) are applied to at least 25 % of offered course in each semester
(7) Teaching strategies, course delivery, or learning outcome evaluation are improved from program report (TQF 7) in previous year
(8) All new faculty members (if any) attend orientation session or provided guideline on teaching
(9) All faculty members attend academic and/or professional development program at least once a year
(10) At least 50 % of supported staffs (if any) attend academic and/or professional development program each year
(11) Average level of program quality satisfaction of graduating students/newly graduates are at least 3.5 out of 5.0
(12) Average level of newly graduates satisfaction of employers are at least 3.5 out of 5.0
Etc.

Higher Education Institution may impose additional indicators to align with university mission and objectives or raising goal for higher standard which are identified in the program

The performance of certified university according to national qualification framework; HEd must achieve all indicators at the “Good” level for two years consecutively and it will be continually monitored base on TQF. To pass the evaluation, indicator 1 – 5 must be achieved and achieved at least 80 % of indicators

Sector 7 Teaching Quality

1. Evaluation Report of Current Academic Year Offered Course

1.1 Evaluated Courses and Improvement Plan

Identify course code and course title of evaluated course including evaluation methods (eg. evaluated by students) and implemented plan

Course Code and Course Title	Evaluation by Students	Other Quality Evaluation Methods (Please specify)	Implemented Plan
Yes	No	Yes	No

1.2 Summary of Evaluation Report

Level of Teaching Quality

2. Effectiveness of Teaching Strategies

Comment on teaching plan, strategies, and teaching method in order to develop course content whether they comply with program specification (TQF 2) section 8. This evaluation is to evaluate overall course delivery not the instructor. Student comments will be employed to improve teaching strategy and method.

2.1 Summary of instructor comments and feedback from other sources

Summarize instructor suggestion and comments from external expert on teaching effectiveness and learning outcome standard. Identify problems and propose solution to the problem.

Remedy plan (eg. trainiing or provide guidance or other solution) Specify courses that were improved.

Summary of instructors suggestion and external expert comments on teaching effectiveness and five learning outcome s	Remedy Plan
2.1 Moral and Ethics
2.2 Knowledge
2.3 Intellectual Development
2.4 Interpersonal skill and responsibility
2.5 Numerical Analysis, Communication, and Information Technology Skill

3. New Faculty Member Orientation

Orientation to provide program guideline Yes No

Identify number of new faculty member if orientation was arranged.

Number of faculty members attended orientation Faculty Members

3.1 Summary of topics/activities in orientation

3.2 Summary of Evaluation Report from attendees

3.3 Justify if orientation was not arranged

4. Faculty members and supported staff development activities

4.1. Organized Activities or Attended Activities

Identify attended activities organized by university or other organizations, number of faculty members, and supported staff

Organized Activities or Attended Activities	Number of Participants
Faculty members	Supported Staff

4.2. Summary of comments and benefit from attend activities (evaluation report of attendees)

Section 8 Comments and Suggestions of External Examiners on Program Quality

1. Comments and suggestions of external evaluators and response of program director/chairperson

Comments and suggestions of external examiners	Response of program director/chairperson
- - - - - - -

2. Improvement Plan

Section 9 Program Improvement Plan

1. Progress of improvement plan proposed in previous year

Identify improvement plan, finished date, responsible person, achievement, and reason for not finish

Improvement Plan	Planned Finished Date	Responsible Person	Achievement (Yes/No)	Reasons for not finish
1.1
1.2

2. Suggestion for program improvement

2.1. Suggestions to improve program structure (number of credit hours of core course, major course, etc.)

-

-

- etc.

2.2. Proposition to improve courses (extent or remove some course content, change teaching method and learning outcome evaluation, etc.)

-

-

- etc.

2.3. Faculty members and supported staff development program

-

-

- etc.

3. Improvement Plan of Academic Year

Identify improvement plan, finished date, and responsible person

Improvement Plan	Finished Date	Responsible Person

Faculty members responsible for the program :

Full name Signature : ____________ Submit date:

Full name Signature : ____________ Submit date:

Full name Signature : ____________ Submit date:

Full name Signature : ____________ Submit date:

Full name Signature : ____________ Submit date:

Program Director/Chairperson :

Signature : __________________________ Submit date:

Approved by (Associate Dean for Academic Affairs)

Signature : __________________________ Date:

Approved by (Dean)

Signature : __________________________ Date :

Attachment

1. Photocopy of all course reports

2. Evaluation/grading criteria

3. Evaluation Report of graduates in evaluated year

4. Evaluation Report of External Expert